Serviceability Margin and Foundation Reserve Assessment of a Reinforced Concrete Airport Terminal Structure in Bolaang Mongondow, Indonesia

Authors

  • Franky R. Tombokan Politeknik Negeri Manado
  • Don R. G. Kabo Politeknik Negeri Manado
  • Herman Alfis Tumengkol Politeknik Negeri Manado
  • Noldie E. Kondoj Politeknik Negeri Manado
  • Dwars Soukotta Politeknik Negeri Manado
  • Nixon Mantiri Politeknik Negeri Manado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v6i6.64

Keywords:

Serviceability, Demand-Capacity Ratio, Inter-Story Drift, Bored Pile, Foundation Reserve, ETABS, Airport Terminal, Seismic Design

Abstract

This paper presents a serviceability-centered reappraisal of a reinforced concrete airport terminal structure in Bolaang Mongondow, Indonesia. Unlike the earlier design-oriented report that mainly documented member reinforcement and general structural safety, this study focuses on the location and magnitude of performance margins after design. Secondary structural outputs from an ETABS v.21 model, response spectrum parameters, wind pressure results, bored-pile bearing capacity, and settlement estimates were reorganized into demand-capacity ratios. Inter-story drift, bored-pile bearing, and foundation settlement were selected as the primary observation variables because they directly indicate serviceability, reserve capacity, and potential operational risk for a public terminal building. The analysis shows that the upper story drift is the controlling serviceability indicator. The maximum drift demand in both X and Y directions reaches 29.04 mm against an allowable value of 30.00 mm, producing a demand-capacity ratio of 0.968 and leaving only 3.2% residual drift margin. In contrast, the bored-pile foundation still has a bearing-capacity demand ratio of 0.715, equivalent to a capacity reserve of about 39.8% relative to the applied maximum axial demand. The estimated pile settlement of 4.956 mm corresponds to only 19.5% of the 25.4 mm serviceability limit. These findings indicate that the foundation response is not the controlling issue; instead, construction tolerance, diaphragm action, cladding connection, and nonstructural components at the upper level deserve closer post-design verification. The proposed reserve-based reading provides a practical quality-control layer for airport terminal structures located in seismic regions

References

ACI Committee 318. (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-19) and commentary. American Concrete Institute.

American Society of Civil Engineers. (2022). Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures (ASCE/SEI 7-22). American Society of Civil Engineers.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2019). SNI 1726:2019 Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan nongedung. BSN.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2019). SNI 2847:2019 Persyaratan beton struktural untuk bangunan gedung dan penjelasan. BSN.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2020). SNI 1727:2020 Beban desain minimum dan kriteria terkait untuk bangunan gedung dan struktur lain. BSN.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2020). SNI 8900:2020 Panduan desain sederhana untuk bangunan beton bertulang. BSN.

Çelebi, E., & Kırtel, O. (2025). Seismic performance of reinforced concrete framed buildings with ribbed slabs at the affected region by 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 23, 3623-3646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-025-02191-0

Computers and Structures, Inc. (2023). ETABS v21 integrated software for structural analysis and design. CSI.

Lonan, T. P., Sumajouw, J. A. J., Hombokau, C., Pangemanan, N. A., Toad, W., & Kabo, D. R. G. (2025). Reinforced concrete structure planning as an alternative design for Bolaang Mongondow Airport terminal building. International Journal of Integrative Sciences, 4(5), 981-992. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v4i5.247

Putri, K. M. E., Fatikasari, A. D., & Wibisana, H. (2025). Comparison of bored pile capacity based on analytical design and pile load test: A case study. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, 5(1).

Sharma, K. K., Imam, A., Kumar, P., & Olaiya, B. C. (2025). Displacement-based seismic fragility assessment of a high-rise reinforced concrete building. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 38419. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22256-z

Suliman, M., & Lu, L. (2024). A comparative study of seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete frame structures using Chinese and African seismic codes. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2024, Article 5588833. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5588833

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

Issue

Section

Articles