A Structured Humanistic Approach to Mathematics Learning: Development and Validation for Junior High School Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v6i9.128Keywords:
Humanistic Mathematics Learning; Learning Design; Educational Design Research; Mathematics Education; ValidityAbstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a humanistic mathematics learning design for junior high school students that provides a systematic framework for implementing humanistic principles in mathematics learning. The study employed an Educational Design Research (EDR) approach based on the Plomp model, focusing on the development and validation of the learning design and its supporting instruments. The developed prototype consisted of a humanistic mathematics learning design guide, learning implementation observation sheet, teacher and student response questionnaires, teaching and learning materials, learning achievement test, and attitude assessment instrument. The prototype was evaluated by two experts in mathematics education using validation instruments covering theoretical foundations, design procedures, learning outcomes, content organization, humanistic learning activities, learning activity design, assessment strategies, and design format. The results showed that the developed learning design and supporting instruments achieved a high level of validity, with most components classified as Very Valid and the learning achievement test construct classified as Valid. The overall expert agreement index reached 0.96, indicating a high level of consistency in expert judgments. The developed design integrates cognitive, affective, social, and reflective dimensions through four phases: problem introduction, collaboration, interaction, and reflection, while positioning students as active participants and teachers as facilitators. These findings indicate that the developed design provides a valid, structured, and implementable framework for meaningful and student-centered humanistic mathematics learning. Further research is needed to examine its practicality and effectiveness through classroom implementation.
References
& Waluya, St. B. (2015). Humanistic Mathematics Learning With Creative Problem Solving Assisted Interactive Compact Disk to Improve Creative Thinking Ability. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:56739761
Murphy, S., & Ingram, N. (2023). A scoping review of research into mathematics classroom practices and affect. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104235
Namkung, J. M., Peng, P., & Lin, X. (2019). The Relation Between Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematics Performance Among School-Aged Students: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 459–496. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319843494
Polman, J., Hornstra, L., & Volman, M. (2021). The meaning of meaningful learning in mathematics in upper-primary education. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09337-8
Schoenherr, J., Schukajlow, S., & Pekrun, R. (2025). Emotions in mathematics learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 57(4), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01651-w
Schukajlow, S., & Rakoczy, K. (2016). The power of emotions: Can enjoyment and boredom explain the impact of individual preconditions and teaching methods on interest and performance in mathematics? Learning and Instruction, 44, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.05.001
Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2023). Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Where we are today and where we need to go. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01463-2
Setiawati, E., & Saptatiningsih, I. R. (2022). Humanist Learning Model to Strengthen Character Education in Culture-Based Schools. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i14.12043
Shodiq, S. F., & Makrufi, A. D. (2026). Empathy as a moderator among social competence, peer support, and adolescent responsibility in Indonesian adolescents: an empirical study. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2026.2657347
Sholikhah, F. F., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2022). Humanistic mathematics learning in a scientific approach: What and how to implement it? 050017. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0108511
Widjajanti, D. B. (2019). Making mathematics classes more humanistic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1), 012096. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012096
Winarno, W., Zuhri, M., Mansur, M., Sutomo, I., & Widhyahrini, K. (2019). Development of Assessment for the Learning of the Humanistic Model to Improve Evaluation of Elementary School Mathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1244a
Zhang, J., Zhao, N., & Kong, Q. P. (2019). The Relationship Between Math Anxiety and Math Performance: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Surya Putra Raharja, Usman Mulbar, Hamzah Upu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

































