Legal Certainty-Based Supervision of Notaries Violating the Code of Ethics in Malang City

Syena Handoko Bimantoro; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani

doi:10.55927/mudima.v6i5.59

Authors

Syena Handoko Bimantoro Universitas Brawijaya
Rachmi Sulistyarini Universitas Brawijaya
Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v6i5.59

Keywords:

Law Enforcement, Legal Certainty, Regional Supervisory Council, Notary, Notary Code of Ethics

Abstract

This article examines legal certainty-based law enforcement by the Regional Supervisory Council against Notaries who violate the Code of Ethics, with a study focused on the Regional Supervisory Council of Malang City. The research discusses the implementation of Article 67 paragraph (1) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning supervision and guidance of Notaries, the dominant factors causing ethical violations, and the obstacles and efforts of the Regional Supervisory Council in realizing legal certainty. This research uses a socio-legal method with an empirical juridical approach. Primary data were obtained through interviews with the Chairperson of the Regional Supervisory Council of Malang City, while secondary data were collected from laws and regulations, books, journals, the Notary Code of Ethics, and relevant legal sources. The findings show that supervision is carried out preventively through routine protocol inspections and guidance, and repressively through examination of public reports. However, obstacles remain, including weak integrity, incomplete protocols, limited evidence, and limited authority to impose final sanctions. Therefore, supervision must be strengthened to be clearer, more consistent, measurable, and legally certain.

References

Edgar, C. V., & Utama, Y. J. (2026). Analisis Yuridis Fenomena Persaingan Tidak Sehat Dalam Praktik Jabatan Notaris. Law, Development and Justice Review, 9(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.9.2026.44-61

Fikri, E. D. (2024). AKIBAT HUKUM NOTARIS YANG BEKERJA SAMA DENGAN BIRO JASA. Wijaya Putra Law Review, 3(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.38156/wplr.v3i1.182

Imania, D., Ngadino, N., & Hafidh Prasetyo, M. (2020). TANGGUNG JAWAB DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI NOTARIS SECARA PERDATA TERHADAP AKTA YANG DIBUATNYA. Notarius, 13(1), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i1.30394

Jaya, W. P. (2018). Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Berkenaan Dengan Kebenaran Substansi Akta Otentik. Rechtidee, 12(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v12i2.2872

Kusuma Prihayuningtyas, A., & Silviana, A. (2023). Timbulnya Persaingan Tidak Sehat Antar Notaris Sebagai Dampak Dari Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 8(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol8.iss1.art3

Nadia, N., Rizanizarli, R., & Rinaldi, Y. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempersulit Proses Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(2), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i2.786

Purwaningsih, E. (2015). BENTUK PELANGGARAN HUKUM NOTARIS DI WILAYAH PROVINSI BANTEN DAN PENEGAKAN HUKUMNYA. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 27(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15907

Rifa’i, A., & Iftitah, A. (2018). BENTUK-BENTUK PELANGGARAN HUKUM DALAM PELAKSANAAN JABATAN NOTARIS. Jurnal Supremasi, 4. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v8i2.486

Wardio, D., & Hanim, L. (2018). Peranan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) Terhadap Pengawasan Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris Di Kabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Akta, 5(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2540

Yustica, A., Ngadino, N., & Maharani Sukma, N. (2019). PERAN ETIKA PROFESI NOTARIS SEBAGAI UPAYA PENEGAKAN HUKUM. Notarius, 13(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i1.29162